Reference: Some writing on CoA (and how it should have buckled up to a bottom-up approach)

For my own reference, collating some of my writings on the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court to oversee the reforms in the Board of Control for Cricket in India. It has been nearly 16 months since the CoA was appointed. The Lodha Panel itself tried to bring in the reforms but recommended that Administrators be appointed to ensure that BCCI would comply with the Lodha report as accepted by the Supreme Court on July 18, 2016.   

 

August 24, 2017 (FirstPost.com): BCCI-COA tussle over implementation of constitutional changes turning out to be a timeless Test

It is interesting that on Wednesday, the Supreme Court did not accept the CoA recommendation to sack the three key BCCI office-bearers for non-compliance. Instead, Acting President CK Khanna, Acting Secretary Amitabh Choudhary and Treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry have been asked to explain why the Supreme Court order of 18 July, 2016 has not been implemented.

That is not the only place where the CoA’s enthusiasm appears to have been brushed aside. In its fifth Status Report, it prayed Supreme Court for directions to conduct elections in State Associations, establish a new funds disbursement policy, form a committee to conduct forensic audit of each State Association.

https://www.firstpost.com/firstcricket/sports-news/bcci-coa-tussle-over-implementation-of-constitutional-changes-turning-out-to-be-a-timeless-test-3967497.html

 

August 17, 2017 (FirstPost.com): CoA’s status report on BCCI a sound tactic, but doesn’t help in implementation of Lodha Panel reforms

It was always clear to anyone who has observed cricket administration that the CoA would have to employ a bottom-up State Associations first approach rather than attempt to reform BCCI with a top-down philosophy. For, if BCCI has to embrace a new constitution, it needs a 75 percent majority and the present dispensation from each state would not let that happen.

And that could happen only if those attending the meeting accept, understand, implement and adhere to the Supreme Court’s order in letter and spirit. Instead of seeking to ensure that the constituents of a BCCI meeting were those who bought into the Supreme Court order, CoA wasted a lot of time in talking to them, even getting ready to represent BCCI’s issues before the court. It was trying a carrot-and-stick policy when it was only assigned the task of implementing the court order.

The CoA has finally arrived at the conclusion that state/member associations of BCCI have no desire to implement the fundamental core of the reforms mandated by the Supreme Court. Curiously, CoA asked state units for details of grievance redressal officers only on 8 June and, more importantly, details of their membership only on at the beginning of August.

https://www.firstpost.com/firstcricket/sports-news/coas-status-report-on-bcci-a-sound-tactic-but-doesnt-help-in-implementation-of-lodha-panel-reforms-3940979.html

 

July 14 (FirstPost.com): Ravi Shastri named India coach: SC needs to quickly restore sanity amidst COA-CAC-BCCI chaos

From a distance, and if it has the time away from the dozens of matters of utmost importance that it hears and adjudicates upon each day, even the highest court in the country could be left wondering if its choice of people for the COA was the best. Two of the COA members were relieved by the court on 14 June and a third has played the media with delight and impunity.

The sooner the Supreme Court restores sanity within the portals of BCCI the greater will be the chances that the country’s apex cricket body will regain its name as Board of Control for Cricket in India.

https://www.firstpost.com/sports/ravi-shastri-named-india-coach-sc-needs-to-quickly-restore-sanity-amidst-coa-cac-bcci-chaos-3813539.html

 

June 30, 2017 (The Tribune): No back-foot strokes, just reform BCCI

 

Until its meeting with State Cricket Associations on June 25, it had made precious little effort to usher in change in the governance model. Why was there such a delay in understanding and enforcing the Supreme Court’s clear orders? In the past few months, BCCI has used the CoA’s diffused interest in the reforms to successfully divert attention to other areas. 

The CoA’s mandate is to administer the reforms Supreme Court has ordered in BCCI. Clearly, it is not to seek to impress upon the Supreme Court on behalf of BCCI on the three contentious issues: one-state-one-vote; 70-year age cap; cooling-off period. As anyone who has followed the case in the Supreme Court would know, the time for negotiations is long gone. 

 

In his media interactions, Vinod Rai suggested that the CoA could not call the shots since whatever it said was contested by BCCI office-bearers or state associations. He also said the CoA wanted to give sufficient time to state units to think how to go about it and make the necessary changes. Besides, he said, CoA would attempt to get  them to make changes rather than imposing things on them. 

Clearly, Rai — like Ramachandra Guha wrote in his letter after quitting the CoA — believes that the Supreme Court wanted CoA to implement the Lodha Committee “recommendations”. If he has been quoted right, he appears to have overlooked the small matter of the Supreme Court having embraced the recommendations in toto, and ordered these to be implemented.

The sooner CoA gets its focus back on the Supreme Court’s order to bring in the reforms the better it will be. That Indian cricket needs a better governance structure has been clearly established by the apex Court. Neither the Lodha Committee nor the CoA have been able to get down to the brass tacks in bringing in the desired change in the BCCI’s state units and in the BCCI itself.

 

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/comment/no-back-foot-strokes-just-reform-bcci/429414.html

 

June 3, 2017 (CatchNews.com): Poor timing apart, Guha’s bombshell reveals even CoA can’t handle BCCI rot

 One of CoA’s most important tasks is the improvement in the governance structure of the BCCI and its state units. From a distance, it does appear that the CoA has done little to set things in order. 

 

Instead of focusing on getting the state units to comply with the Lodha Committee recommendations, which were approved by the Supreme Court, CoA trained its guns elsewhere.

 

Should the CoA have been wetting its feet in administrative and cricketing issues? Certainly not, especially since it was draining into its energy and time. Things like the change of the women’s team coach or the drama over the men’s coach should easily have been left to the administrative set up within BCCI.

http://www.catchnews.com/sports-news/poor-timing-apart-guha-s-bombshell-reveals-even-coa-can-t-handle-bcci-rot-63551.html

 

January 30, 2017 (CatchNews.com): Meet the four people appointed by SC to clean up BCCI. They have an onerous task

The BCCI general body, which alone can make the statute changes, will need the coming together of the representatives of the affiliated state associations. It implies that the state associations must comply with the Lodha Committee recommendations first, before they can nominate anyone to attend the BCCI general body meeting.

Clearly, reforms in the BCCI can be ushered in only when they have been implemented at the lower level, the state associations. It’s a huge task for the CoA to ensure that the state associations restrict the tenures of their office-bearers and prescribe disqualifications, do away with proxy voting, provide transparency in functioning, be open to scrutiny and audit by the BCCI and include players in membership and management, as envisaged by the Lodha Committee.

The four-member CoA will surely need help from more than a few to ensure that all state associations fall in line, so that the BCCI can become Lodha-compliant as well. The Lodha Committee identified that it was important to have a uniformity in the constitution and functioning of the state Associations.

http://www.catchnews.com/sports-news/meet-the-four-people-appointed-by-sc-to-clean-up-bcci-they-have-an-onerous-task-1485794707.html

 

 

 

 

About Rajaraman 453 Articles
Born on March 10, 1961 in Hyderabad, I wanted to be an electronics engineer but my focus on cricket and basketball at school and junior college meant that I missed qualifying from the entrance examination. I led the School and Junior College basketball teams. I then decided he would be sports a journalist like my father, Mr N Ganesan. While I graduated in commerce from the Badruka College of Arts and Commerce, I also spent more time in sports, representing Andhra Pradesh in the National Basketball Championship in 1980 and Osmania University in 1981-82. I joined the 1981-82 batch of Osmania Univeristy's Bachelor in Communication and Journalism. I missed the gold medal by 0.6 per cent and was pursuing the Masters' degree when The Hindu offered me a job as Sub-Editor in Madras. I took up The Hindu assignment on March 17, 1983. Though my job entailed editing functions only, I got to cover the annual Sholavaram motor racing grands prix in 1985 and 1986 and the Himalayan Rally in 1985 when my photographs also found expression in The Sportstar. I left The Hindu in November 1986 to join Press Trust of India as Sports Reporter in Hyderabad. I was called to New Delhi to report on the World Table Tennis Championship in March 1987. I covered a variety of events, including the SAF Games in Calcutta in 1987 and Islamabad in 1989. I ventured to Delhi in July 1992 when I joined The Pioneer as a Senior Reporter/Sub-Editor (Sports). My cricket writing skills came to the fore when I was deputed to write on India's tour of Sri Lanka in July-August 1993. I was rewarded with a promotion as Deputy Sports Editor in 1995. The departure of the Sports Editor in January 1996 saw me hold charge. A good performance during the 1996 World Cup cricket and the Olympic Games in Atlanta - when The Pioneer brought out a four-page supplement every day saw me being confirmed as Sports Editor in August 1996. The Hindustan Times, Delhi's largest newspaper, appointed me as Associate Editor (Sports) in January 1997. I conceived and launched a weekly colour supplement, Sport during the World Cup football finals in 1998. I covered the 1998 Asian Games in Bangkok and the 1999 World Cup cricket in England. I left the Hindustan Times on February 23, 2000 to take up position as Editor, www.cricketnext.com on February 26 and can claim with pride that I played no mean role in building a good site that is rated among the best cricket news sites. Besides, a number of TV channels – NDTV, Star News, Doordarshan, CNBC, Zee News – and radio stations like BBC, SABC and ABC have invite me to in-studio discussions on cricket. In 2001, I authored a book, Match-fixing: The Enemy Within (Har Anand Publications). I joined www.espnstar.com as Senior Editor in June 2001 and worked for two years, helping it transform from a corporate website to a respected sports site and playing a role in driving the hugely popular online fantasy cricket game, Super Selector. I left the website to pursue life as a freelance writer and consultant, editing the Afro-Asian Games Observer in Hyderabad in October-November 2003 and helping the Board of Control for Cricket in India's Communication Committee. I joined the respected weekly magazine Outlook as Senior Special Correspondent in April 2005 and worked there till September 2007, with a story highlighting Sunil Gavaskar's minimal contribution to Indian cricket after his retirement being one of the best in my career. For a year, till Sept 30, 2008, I was Sports Editor, Samay, Sahara India's National news channel. I live in New Delhi with my wife Sudha and daughter Priya and after a short stint with www.iplt20.com and www.t20.com, I am now consultant with the Organising Committee Commonwealth Games 2010 Delhi (28° 40' 0 N, 77° 13' 0 E) lending my shoulder to the wheel that will make India a hugely popular sports destination.